Blog

Have you ever wondered if Montana’s pristine wilderness comes with a hidden price? The answer might surprise you: Montana experiences approximately 1,500 wildfires annually, burning an average of 350,000 acres—ranking it among the most fire-prone states in America.

For anyone considering a move to Big Sky Country, planning a summer vacation, or simply curious about the changing landscape of the American West, understanding Montana’s wildfire reality isn’t optional—it’s essential.

The romantic image of unspoiled forests and mountain vistas exists alongside a sobering truth that shapes daily life for residents and dramatically impacts visitors during peak season.

In this comprehensive guide, you’ll discover the full scope of Montana’s wildfire situation: when and why fires occur, which regions face the highest risk, how climate change is intensifying the threat, and what communities are doing to adapt.

• Related article: Montana’s Livability

Whether you’re concerned about air quality during your Glacier National Park trip, considering property in the wildland-urban interface, or simply want to understand one of the West’s most pressing environmental challenges, this article will equip you with the knowledge to navigate Montana’s fire reality with confidence and awareness.

Montana’s Fire Season: When and Why Fires Rage

Montana’s fire season follows a predictable yet increasingly intense pattern that residents have come to anticipate with growing concern. Typically, the fire season begins in early July as summer temperatures rise and spring moisture evaporates from the landscape. The season intensifies through August and often extends into September, with some years seeing significant fire activity stretching into October if autumn rains are delayed.

The traditional peak occurs from mid-July through late August when the combination of high temperatures, low humidity, and seasonal drought conditions create the perfect environment for wildfire ignition and spread. During these peak weeks, afternoon temperatures regularly climb above 90°F in many parts of the state, while relative humidity can drop below 15%—creating what firefighters call “critical fire weather.”

Several climate factors contribute to the severity of Montana’s fire season:

1. Winter snowpack levels play a crucial role in determining fire risk months later. Below-average snowpack means less moisture in the soil and vegetation as summer approaches, creating drier fuel conditions.
2. Spring rainfall patterns can either mitigate or exacerbate fire danger. A wet spring promotes vegetation growth, which subsequently dries out and becomes potential fuel during summer dry spells.
3. Summer drought conditions have become increasingly common in Montana, with extended periods without significant rainfall creating tinder-dry conditions across forests and grasslands.
4. Temperature trends show Montana’s summers becoming hotter, with more frequent and intense heat waves that rapidly dry out vegetation and accelerate fire spread.
5. Wind patterns significantly impact fire behavior, with Montana’s characteristic gusty conditions capable of transforming a manageable fire into an explosive, fast-moving inferno within hours.

Climate scientists have documented a troubling trend: Montana’s fire season has expanded by nearly two months since the 1970s, starting earlier and ending later. This extension reflects broader climate change patterns affecting the American West, with Montana sitting at the epicenter of these transformations. The state now regularly experiences “fire years” rather than mere “fire seasons,” with wildfire activity becoming an increasingly dominant feature of Montana’s environmental reality.

Does Montana Get Wildfires? What’s the Reality?

Montana is no stranger to wildfires. In fact, the state experiences hundreds of wildfires annually, with the reality being far more severe than many outsiders might realize. On average, Montana sees approximately 1,500 wildfires each year, burning an average of 350,000 acres of land. These numbers place Montana firmly among the most wildfire-prone states in the western United States.

When comparing Montana to other Western states, it ranks consistently in the top five for wildfire activity. While California often dominates national headlines with its catastrophic fire seasons, Montana’s wildfire reality is similarly challenging. During severe fire years, Montana can even surpass other Western states in total acreage burned. For instance, in 2017, Montana experienced its largest fire season since 1910, with over 1.4 million acres burned—outpacing even California that year.

Recent trends show an alarming pattern: Montana’s fire seasons are growing longer and more intense. The traditional fire season once ran from July through September, but climate data now shows fires starting as early as April and continuing into November. The past decade (2013-2023) has included several of Montana’s most destructive fire years on record.

What’s particularly concerning is the increasing size and intensity of these fires. Montana’s Department of Natural Resources and Conservation reports that high-severity fires—those that burn with extreme intensity and cause significant ecological changes—have increased by approximately 30% since the early 2000s. These fires burn hotter, spread faster, and are more difficult to contain than the historical norm for the region.

The reality is clear: Montana not only experiences wildfires—it faces some of the most significant wildfire challenges in the nation, with a trend toward increasingly destructive fire seasons that threaten communities, natural resources, and the state’s iconic landscapes.

Montana’s History with Wildfires: Lessons from the Flames

Montana’s landscape bears the scars of countless wildfires that have shaped both its ecology and communities over generations. The state’s fire history reveals not just destruction, but also valuable lessons about forest management, community preparedness, and climate adaptation.

The 1910 “Big Burn” stands as perhaps Montana’s most infamous wildfire event, consuming over 3 million acres across Montana, Idaho, and Washington. This catastrophic fire killed 86 people and destroyed several towns, fundamentally changing U.S. forest fire policy for decades. The disaster led to aggressive fire suppression policies that would later prove problematic, as forests became unnaturally dense with fuel.

The Mann Gulch Fire of 1949 claimed the lives of 13 smokejumpers in a tragic event that revolutionized wildfire safety protocols and training. This disaster, immortalized in Norman Maclean’s “Young Men and Fire,” taught valuable lessons about fire behavior and escape procedures that continue to save lives today.

In more recent decades, Montana has experienced increasingly severe fire seasons. The 2000 fire season saw over 950,000 acres burn across the state, part of one of the worst fire years in U.S. history. The 2012 Ash Creek Fire consumed over 249,000 acres in southeastern Montana, while the 2017 Lodgepole Complex Fire burned more than 270,000 acres, becoming the largest fire in the state that year.

The 2017 fire season was particularly devastating, with over 1.4 million acres burned across Montana, causing widespread evacuations, property damage, and months of hazardous air quality. This season highlighted the growing impact of climate change on fire behavior and the challenges of protecting communities in the wildland-urban interface.

These historical fires have taught Montana valuable lessons. First, the counterproductive nature of total fire suppression is now recognized, with controlled burns and forest thinning becoming standard management practices. Second, community planning has evolved to incorporate defensible space requirements and fire-resistant building materials in fire-prone areas. Third, interagency coordination has dramatically improved, allowing for faster response and resource sharing during major events.

Perhaps most importantly, Montana has learned that wildfires are not merely destructive events to be feared but natural processes essential to forest health when properly managed. This evolving understanding continues to shape how Montana prepares for and responds to the annual reality of wildfire season.

Montana’s Wildfire Hotspots: High-Risk Regions and Landscapes

Montana’s vast and diverse landscape isn’t uniformly vulnerable to wildfires. Certain regions within the state face significantly higher wildfire risks due to their unique geographical features, vegetation types, and climate patterns. Understanding these high-risk areas is crucial for both residents and visitors during fire season.

The western portion of Montana, dominated by dense forests and mountainous terrain, consistently experiences the highest wildfire activity. The combination of coniferous forests, steep slopes, and lightning-prone mountain ranges creates ideal conditions for fire ignition and spread. Counties like Missoula, Ravalli, and Lincoln frequently find themselves on the frontlines of major wildfire events.

The Bitterroot Valley, nestled between the Bitterroot and Sapphire Mountain ranges, stands out as particularly susceptible. Its narrow valley configuration creates wind tunnels that can rapidly accelerate wildfire spread, while its dense pine forests provide abundant fuel. The 2000 Bitterroot Complex Fire, which burned over 350,000 acres, demonstrated this region’s vulnerability.

Montana’s national forests represent significant wildfire hotspots. The Lolo, Bitterroot, Helena-Lewis and Clark, and Kootenai National Forests experience recurring fire activity. These forests contain extensive stands of lodgepole pine and other species that have evolved with fire as part of their ecological cycle, making periodic burns inevitable.

Several landscape features contribute significantly to wildfire risk across Montana:

• South-facing slopes receive more direct sunlight, creating drier conditions that increase fire potential
• Steep terrain accelerates fire spread by preheating fuels above advancing flames
• Dense coniferous forests with ladder fuels that allow flames to climb from forest floor to canopy
• Remote areas with limited access that complicate firefighting efforts
• Wind-prone canyons and valleys that can funnel and intensify fire behavior

The wildland-urban interface—where human development meets natural areas—represents another high-risk zone. Communities like Seeley Lake, West Yellowstone, and areas around Flathead Lake face elevated risk as residential expansion pushes into forested landscapes. These areas combine abundant natural fuels with human-caused ignition sources.

Eastern Montana presents a different but equally dangerous wildfire profile. The grasslands and prairies of counties like Rosebud, Powder River, and Garfield experience fast-moving grass fires that can consume thousands of acres in hours. While these fires typically burn with less intensity than forest fires, their rapid spread can make them particularly dangerous.

Climate patterns also influence regional fire risk. Areas experiencing prolonged drought conditions become especially vulnerable, with this risk shifting geographically from season to season based on precipitation patterns. In recent years, drought has expanded wildfire risk into previously less-affected regions of central Montana.

Understanding these regional variations in wildfire risk is essential for Montana’s comprehensive fire management strategy. By identifying high-risk landscapes, authorities can prioritize prevention efforts, allocate firefighting resources strategically, and help communities prepare for the reality of Montana’s wildfire season.

How Climate Change is Affecting Montana’s Wildfire Patterns

Montana’s relationship with wildfires is undergoing a profound transformation due to climate change. What was once a predictable natural phenomenon has evolved into something more intense, more frequent, and more destructive. The Big Sky Country is experiencing a new reality that challenges both ecological systems and human communities.

In recent decades, Montana has witnessed a dramatic shift in its fire seasons. What historically began in late July or August and concluded by October now often ignites in June and can extend well into November. This extension isn’t merely a matter of calendar dates—it represents approximately 40-60 additional days annually where conditions favor fire ignition and spread. The longer fire window means more opportunities for ignitions and greater challenges for firefighting resources.

The driving force behind these changes is the warming climate. Montana’s average temperatures have increased by about 2-3°F since the early 20th century, with higher elevation areas experiencing even greater warming. This temperature increase directly impacts wildfire behavior in multiple ways:

Snowpack in Montana’s mountains is melting 1-4 weeks earlier than it did 50 years ago, leaving forests and grasslands drier for longer periods. Spring precipitation that once helped maintain soil moisture into summer now often falls as rain instead of snow, running off quickly rather than slowly releasing moisture as snowpack melts.

Summer heat waves have become more intense and prolonged. These periods of extreme heat rapidly draw moisture from vegetation, creating ideal conditions for fire ignition and spread. The combination of earlier snowmelt and hotter summers has extended drought conditions across much of Montana, with soil moisture deficits becoming increasingly common.

Perhaps most concerning is the emergence of what fire scientists call “fire weather”—the combination of low humidity, high temperatures, and strong winds that can transform a manageable wildfire into an unstoppable force. Days with extreme fire weather have increased by 25-30% in Montana since the 1970s.

Scientific projections for Montana’s fire future paint a sobering picture. Climate models consistently predict that by mid-century, the annual area burned by wildfires in Montana could increase by 200-600% compared to historical averages. The state is likely to experience more “megafires”—those exceeding 100,000 acres—which were once rare but are becoming increasingly common.

Forest composition is also expected to change. The subalpine forests dominated by lodgepole pine and subalpine fir may gradually be replaced by more fire-adapted species or convert to grasslands in some areas. These ecological transitions will have cascading effects on wildlife habitat, watershed function, and carbon storage.

Does Montana get wildfires? The reality is that Montana has always experienced wildfires, but climate change is fundamentally altering their character and impact. The fires burning today are not the same as those that shaped Montana’s landscapes for millennia. They burn hotter, spread faster, and resist control more effectively than historical fires. For Montana’s communities, ecosystems, and economy, adapting to this new fire reality represents one of the greatest challenges of the coming decades.

The Human Toll: How Wildfires Impact Montana Communities

Montana’s wildfires don’t just burn forests—they fundamentally alter lives. When the smoke settles, the economic, health, and social impacts reverberate through communities for years to come.

Economically, wildfires deliver devastating blows to Montana’s residents. The 2017 fire season alone cost the state over $74 million in firefighting expenses, while tourism losses exceeded $240 million as visitors canceled trips during peak season. Property damage statistics tell an equally sobering story—in the last decade, over 1,200 structures have been destroyed, including approximately 850 primary residences. Insurance claims related to wildfire damage in Montana have topped $500 million since 2015, with many rural properties facing increasingly difficult insurance markets or outright policy cancellations.

The health consequences extend far beyond the immediate danger zone. Smoke from Montana wildfires regularly pushes air quality into hazardous territory, with particulate matter concentrations exceeding federal standards for weeks at a time. Hospital admissions for respiratory issues typically increase 15-30% during major fire events, with emergency room visits for asthma spiking up to 40% in affected communities. The elderly and children face particular vulnerability—studies show increased rates of pneumonia, bronchitis, and worsened COPD symptoms during and after fire seasons.

Socially, the disruption cannot be overstated. Evacuation statistics reveal that an average of 7,500 Montanans are displaced annually by wildfire threats, with the 2021 season forcing over 12,000 residents to flee their homes. These evacuations average 12 days in length but can stretch into months for severely impacted areas. Rural communities face particular challenges, with some small towns seeing population declines of 5-10% following major fire events as residents relocate permanently.

Beyond the statistics lie deeper community impacts—disrupted school years, lost family heirlooms, fractured social networks, and the psychological trauma that comes with losing one’s sense of security. Mental health providers report significant increases in anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms in communities recovering from major fire events.

For many Montana residents, wildfire recovery represents a years-long journey. Federal and state assistance programs provide critical support, but rebuilding often stretches family resources to breaking points. Community resilience initiatives have emerged across the state, with neighbors helping neighbors through organized relief efforts, housing assistance, and emotional support networks that showcase Montana’s enduring spirit in the face of natural disaster.

Montana’s Wildfire Management: State and Federal Approaches

Montana employs a comprehensive wildfire management strategy that combines state resources with federal support to address its significant fire challenges. The Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) works closely with federal agencies like the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and National Park Service to coordinate firefighting efforts across jurisdictional boundaries.

State firefighting resources include specialized fire crews, aviation assets, and equipment strategically positioned throughout Montana during fire season. These resources are supplemented by federal teams and equipment when fires exceed local capacity. This partnership is crucial given that approximately 60% of Montana’s forested land falls under federal management.

Prevention stands as a cornerstone of Montana’s wildfire strategy. The state implements robust public education campaigns, particularly in wildland-urban interface areas where human-caused ignitions pose the greatest risk. Fire restrictions are carefully monitored and implemented based on conditions, with stage 1 and stage 2 restrictions limiting activities like campfires, smoking, and equipment use during periods of extreme fire danger.

Controlled burns represent another vital tool in Montana’s fire management arsenal. These prescribed fires serve multiple purposes: reducing hazardous fuel accumulation, improving wildlife habitat, and restoring forest health. State and federal agencies carefully plan these burns during optimal weather windows to minimize escape risk while maximizing ecological benefits. In recent years, Montana has expanded its prescribed fire program, recognizing the role these managed fires play in preventing catastrophic wildfires.

Technology has revolutionized wildfire management in Montana. The state employs an array of advanced tools:

• Remote sensing systems using satellites and aircraft to detect fires in their earliest stages
• Infrared imaging to map fire perimeters and identify hotspots through smoke
• Predictive modeling software that forecasts fire behavior based on weather, topography, and fuel conditions
• Drones equipped with thermal cameras for reconnaissance in hazardous areas
• Mobile applications that provide real-time fire information to both firefighters and the public

Montana’s approach to wildfire management continues to evolve, with increasing emphasis on community involvement through programs like Firewise USA, which helps homeowners create defensible space around structures. The state also participates in the Good Neighbor Authority, allowing state crews to conduct forest management activities on federal lands to reduce fire risk.

Does Montana get wildfires? The reality is that Montana not only experiences wildfires but has developed one of the nation’s most sophisticated multi-jurisdictional approaches to managing them, blending traditional firefighting tactics with cutting-edge technology and preventative strategies to protect its communities and natural resources.

Living with Fire: How Montanans Adapt to Wildfire Season

Montana residents have developed a unique relationship with wildfires, one built on respect, preparation, and resilience. Living in a state where wildfires are an expected part of the annual cycle requires adaptability and a proactive mindset. Most Montanans understand that fire is not just a threat but a natural part of the ecosystem that has shaped the landscape for millennia.

Preparation begins long before smoke appears on the horizon. Many Montana homeowners create defensible space around their properties—a practice that involves clearing vegetation, removing dead trees and branches, and maintaining a buffer zone between forests and structures. This isn’t just a recommendation; it’s become a way of life for those living in the wildland-urban interface.

Communities across the state have embraced FireWise programs, which educate residents about fire-resistant building materials, landscape design, and evacuation planning. In places like Missoula, Bitterroot Valley, and the communities surrounding Yellowstone, neighborhood groups often organize community clean-up days where residents help each other clear brush and reduce fuels around homes.

The Montana cultural attitude toward fire has evolved over generations. While early settlers viewed fire solely as a destructive force to be suppressed, modern Montanans generally recognize fire’s ecological role. Many ranchers and farmers incorporate controlled burns into their land management practices, understanding that fire can rejuvenate soil and promote healthier grasslands.

During active fire seasons, Montanans develop a heightened awareness—checking fire reports becomes as routine as checking the weather. Many families maintain “go bags” with essential documents and supplies ready for quick evacuation. Local businesses often participate in preparedness efforts too, with some hardware stores offering discounts on fire-resistant materials during spring preparation months.

Perhaps most notable is the community solidarity that emerges during major fire events. When evacuations occur, neighbors help neighbors, livestock is sheltered, and community centers transform into support hubs. This spirit of mutual aid reflects Montana’s rural values and practical approach to adversity.

The adaptation to fire also extends to economic planning. Tourism-dependent businesses have learned to diversify offerings and create contingency plans for smoky seasons. Some outfitters now advertise “fire season specials” that focus on activities less affected by smoke or redirect visitors to areas of the state experiencing clearer conditions.

Through generations of experience with wildfire, Montanans have developed a pragmatic resilience—not denying the danger fire presents, but facing it with preparation, community cooperation, and the understanding that living in this spectacular landscape means accepting its natural processes, including fire.

Forest Management and Wildfire Behavior in Montana: Navigating Complex Solutions

Montana’s approach to forest management significantly impacts wildfire behavior across the state. Decades of fire suppression policies have created dense, overgrown forests with unprecedented fuel loads that contribute to more intense and destructive wildfires. This reality has sparked intense debate among scientists, land managers, policymakers, and residents about the most effective forest management practices.

Traditional timber harvesting operations (logging) have long been promoted as a solution to reduce wildfire risk. Proponents argue that removing trees decreases forest density and fuel loads, potentially limiting fire spread. The timber industry points to economic benefits that come alongside this approach—providing jobs while simultaneously addressing fire concerns. However, critics note that commercial logging often removes the largest, most fire-resistant trees while leaving behind smaller trees and combustible slash, sometimes inadvertently increasing fire risk.

Controlled burns (prescribed fire) represent another management approach gaining traction. These carefully planned fires mimic natural processes by clearing underbrush and small trees while leaving mature, fire-resistant trees intact. The Forest Service and other agencies have increased prescribed burning programs in Montana, though public concerns about smoke impacts and escape risks create implementation challenges. Climate change has also narrowed the windows when controlled burns can be safely conducted.

Indigenous knowledge offers valuable perspectives often overlooked in modern forest management discussions. Native American tribes, particularly the Salish, Kootenai, and Blackfeet, have practiced intentional burning for thousands of years to maintain healthy forest ecosystems. These traditional ecological practices created forest mosaics resistant to catastrophic fires while supporting diverse plant and animal communities. More agencies are now incorporating this traditional knowledge into contemporary management strategies.

The debate over best practices continues to evolve as Montana faces increasingly severe fire seasons. Many experts now advocate for an integrated approach that combines multiple strategies—selective thinning in strategic locations, prescribed burns where appropriate, and allowing some natural fires to burn in remote areas. Community involvement in creating defensible space around homes and infrastructure has also become a critical component of Montana’s wildfire management strategy.

As climate change intensifies fire conditions across the West, Montana’s forest management practices must adapt accordingly. The solutions aren’t one-size-fits-all, but require nuanced approaches based on specific forest types, local conditions, and community needs. Finding this balance remains one of the state’s most pressing environmental challenges.

Smoke Impacts and Air Quality Challenges During Montana Wildfires

When wildfires rage across Montana’s vast landscapes, the flames themselves are only part of the danger. Smoke from these fires creates a pervasive health hazard that can extend hundreds of miles beyond the actual burn areas. During major fire seasons, Montana communities often wake to orange-tinted skies and the acrid smell of smoke that can linger for weeks or even months.

The smoke particles from wildfires contain a dangerous mix of gases and fine particles that can penetrate deep into the lungs. PM2.5 (particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers) is especially concerning as these microscopic particles can enter the bloodstream and affect nearly every organ system. During intense fire seasons like those in 2017 and 2021, many Montana communities experienced air quality readings in the “hazardous” category, with PM2.5 levels exceeding 300 μg/m³ – more than 20 times what’s considered safe.

Health departments across Montana regularly issue advisories during wildfire season, recommending that vulnerable populations (including children, elderly, pregnant women, and those with respiratory conditions) limit outdoor exposure. In extreme cases, these advisories extend to the general population, with recommendations to stay indoors with windows closed and air purifiers running.

Montana communities have developed increasingly sophisticated responses to poor air quality events. Schools implement “indoor recess” protocols when air quality deteriorates beyond certain thresholds. Athletic events are postponed or relocated. Libraries, community centers, and other public buildings often serve as “clean air shelters” for those lacking adequate filtration at home.

The state maintains an extensive network of air quality monitoring stations through the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. These stations provide real-time data on particulate matter concentrations and other pollutants. Residents can access this information through websites and mobile apps like “Today’s Air” that use color-coded systems to indicate current conditions. Many Montanans have become accustomed to checking these resources as routinely as they check the weather forecast during summer months.

Local healthcare systems have also adapted to the seasonal challenge of wildfire smoke. Hospitals often see significant increases in emergency room visits for respiratory issues during smoke events. Some healthcare providers now offer “smoke readiness” education, helping patients with conditions like asthma develop action plans for poor air quality days.

Despite these adaptations, the economic and quality-of-life impacts remain substantial. Tourism-dependent businesses suffer when visitors cancel trips during smoky periods. Outdoor workers face difficult choices between economic necessity and health risks. The psychological toll of weeks spent indoors under hazy skies contributes to what some health professionals now recognize as “climate anxiety.”

As climate change drives more frequent and intense fire seasons, Montana communities continue to evolve their approaches to living with seasonal smoke, recognizing that wildfire smoke management has become an essential part of public health infrastructure in the Treasure State.

Federal and State Wildfire Management in Montana: A Complex Partnership

Montana’s vast landscape of forests, grasslands, and wilderness areas falls under a patchwork of jurisdictions, creating a complex web of wildfire management responsibilities. The state’s 16.8 million acres of national forests, numerous national parks including Glacier National Park, and extensive Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands each operate under different federal agencies with distinct approaches to fire management.

The U.S. Forest Service maintains primary jurisdiction over national forests, implementing strategies that have evolved from pure fire suppression to more nuanced approaches incorporating prescribed burns and managed natural fires. In Glacier National Park, the National Park Service follows policies that more readily allow natural fires to play their ecological role when they don’t threaten infrastructure or human safety. Meanwhile, BLM lands, which cover over 8 million acres in Montana, often follow fire management plans that balance resource protection with practical considerations for ranching and other permitted uses.

This jurisdictional complexity creates significant coordination challenges. When wildfires cross boundaries between federal, state, tribal, and private lands, agencies must quickly establish unified command structures. The Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) serves as Montana’s lead state agency for fire management, but must integrate its efforts with federal partners and local fire departments.

Resource allocation presents another persistent challenge. Federal agencies like the Forest Service have faced chronic budget constraints for fire prevention work, often forced to “borrow” from other programs to fund emergency firefighting. Meanwhile, state resources are limited by Montana’s budget realities, creating situations where prevention work that could save money long-term goes unfunded.

Climate change has further strained this system, as longer fire seasons require more sustained coordination between agencies. The establishment of the Northern Rockies Coordination Center in Missoula represents one solution, providing a central hub where federal and state agencies can jointly manage resources during fire season. However, differences in agency cultures, priorities, and legal mandates continue to complicate the seamless coordination needed for effective wildfire response in Montana’s diverse landscapes.

Montana’s Wildfire Warriors: The Heroes on the Frontlines

Montana’s wildfire response system represents one of the most sophisticated firefighting networks in the western United States. When flames threaten communities and wilderness areas, an impressive array of professionals and volunteers mobilize with military precision.

The frontline defense consists of several key teams working in coordination. The U.S. Forest Service maintains elite “hotshot” crews—20-person units specially trained in wildfire suppression tactics. These crews often hike miles into remote terrain with tools and supplies to create containment lines. Montana also relies heavily on smokejumpers based in Missoula, who parachute into inaccessible areas to attack fires in their earliest stages.

Local fire departments form the backbone of community protection, with many rural Montana firefighters trained in both structural and wildland firefighting techniques. The Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) manages specialized wildland fire units stationed strategically throughout the state, ready to deploy during fire season.

The equipment arsenal is equally impressive. Ground crews utilize specialized tools including Pulaski axes (combining an axe and grub hoe), McLeod tools (rake/hoe combinations), and chainsaw teams for creating firebreaks. Water delivery systems range from portable backpack pumps to advanced fire engines modified for off-road capabilities. For larger fires, the aerial assault includes:

• Single Engine Air Tankers (SEATs) delivering precise retardant drops
• Heavy air tankers capable of dropping thousands of gallons of fire retardant
• Bambi buckets” suspended from helicopters for water drops on hot spots
• Infrared scanning aircraft to identify fire movement and hot spots

Training requirements are rigorous and ongoing. All wildland firefighters must complete basic fire behavior and safety training, with physical fitness tests requiring them to carry 45-pound packs over a 3-mile course in under 45 minutes. Advanced positions require hundreds of training hours and years of field experience. Many Montana firefighters pursue certification through the National Wildfire Coordinating Group’s qualification system.

The 2017 Lolo Peak Fire showcased Montana’s firefighting capabilities when lightning ignited a blaze that eventually consumed over 53,000 acres. Despite challenging terrain and extreme fire behavior, coordinated efforts from multiple agencies protected hundreds of homes in the Bitterroot Valley. Firefighters worked 16-hour shifts for weeks, establishing containment lines and conducting strategic burnout operations.

During the devastating 2000 fire season, when multiple large fires burned simultaneously across western Montana, interstate cooperation became essential. The Montana-based Northern Rockies Type 1 Incident Management Team directed resources from 39 states, demonstrating the national firefighting network’s ability to respond to extreme situations.

The human element remains most impressive. Montana’s firefighters routinely work in temperatures exceeding 100°F, hiking steep terrain while carrying heavy equipment, often sleeping in primitive fire camps for weeks at a time. Their commitment to protecting Montana’s communities and natural resources represents the best of the state’s independent yet community-minded spirit.

The Impact of Wildfires on Montana’s Tourism Industry

Montana’s tourism industry, which typically generates over $3.7 billion annually and supports more than 50,000 jobs, faces significant challenges during wildfire season. When smoke fills the air and flames threaten popular destinations, the state’s vital summer tourism economy experiences immediate and sometimes lasting effects.

During active wildfire periods, popular attractions like Glacier National Park and portions of Yellowstone National Park may implement partial or complete closures for public safety. The iconic Going-to-the-Sun Road in Glacier, which draws thousands of visitors daily during summer months, has been closed multiple times in recent years due to encroaching fires. These closures don’t just disappoint travelers; they create a ripple effect throughout Montana’s economy.

Visitor advisories during wildfire season range from air quality warnings to evacuation notices in extreme cases. The Montana Department of Commerce and local tourism boards must balance honest communication about conditions with maintaining visitor interest. Many travelers, upon seeing news coverage of wildfires, cancel their trips entirely rather than adjusting their itineraries to unaffected areas.

For seasonal businesses that rely on a 3-4 month window to generate their annual income, wildfire disruptions can be devastating. Outfitters, guides, rafting companies, and local accommodations in affected areas report revenue losses of 30-70% during severe fire seasons. Even businesses in smoke-affected but not directly threatened areas experience significant cancellations when air quality deteriorates.

The economic consequences extend beyond immediate tourism dollars. Restaurants, retail shops, and service providers all feel the impact when visitor numbers decline. Additionally, the state faces increased costs for firefighting efforts while simultaneously losing tax revenue from reduced tourism spending—creating a challenging financial situation that affects public services and infrastructure maintenance.

Despite these challenges, Montana’s tourism industry has developed increasing resilience. Many businesses now offer flexible cancellation policies during fire season, and regional tourism organizations have created contingency marketing plans that quickly redirect visitors to unaffected areas. Some outfitters have expanded their offerings to include spring and fall experiences, reducing their dependence on the peak summer months most vulnerable to wildfire disruptions.

The Future of Montana’s Wildfires: Preparing for What’s Ahead

Montana’s relationship with wildfires is evolving rapidly as climate conditions change and human development continues to expand into fire-prone areas. Looking ahead, fire management experts and climate scientists paint a challenging picture for the Treasure State, but also highlight opportunities for adaptation and resilience.

Climate projections suggest Montana will likely experience longer and more intense fire seasons in the coming decades. The combination of rising temperatures, earlier snowmelt, and more frequent drought conditions creates an environment where fires can start earlier, burn hotter, and spread faster than historical norms. By mid-century, some models predict Montana’s fire season could extend by 20-30 days compared to the early 2000s.

Communities across Montana are increasingly adopting proactive adaptation strategies rather than simply reacting to fires as they occur. This includes implementing more stringent building codes in the wildland-urban interface, requiring fire-resistant materials and defensible space around structures. Many towns are also investing in community firebreaks and fuel reduction projects that can slow advancing wildfires and provide firefighters with strategic defense points.

On the policy front, Montana is rethinking its approach to forest management. There’s growing recognition that decades of fire suppression have created unnaturally dense forests with high fuel loads. In response, state agencies are expanding prescribed burning programs and mechanical thinning operations to reduce fuel loads in strategic locations. These controlled interventions aim to mimic natural fire cycles while reducing the risk of catastrophic burns.

Community resilience building has become a priority across Montana’s fire-prone regions. Programs like Firewise USA are gaining traction, educating homeowners about creating defensible space and hardening homes against ember storms. Meanwhile, emergency management agencies are developing more sophisticated evacuation plans and communication systems to protect residents when fires do threaten populated areas.

Indigenous fire management practices are also receiving renewed attention. Montana’s tribal communities have centuries of experience using controlled burns to manage landscapes, and partnerships between tribal experts and state agencies are helping to integrate this traditional knowledge into modern fire management strategies.

Does Montana get wildfires? The reality is that Montana not only experiences them now but must prepare for a future where they remain a persistent threat. However, through thoughtful adaptation, policy reform, and community engagement, Montanans are working to build a more fire-resilient state that can withstand the challenges ahead while maintaining healthy forest ecosystems.

FAQs About Montana Wildfires

Sources

• https://www.ucdavis.edu/climate/definitions/wildfire
• https://dnrc.mt.gov/Forestry/Wildfire/current-fire-information
• https://brand.mt.gov/Programs/Office-Of-Tourism/Fire-Information-for-Travelers
• https://landresources.montana.edu/archives/capstone/2008_Capstone.pdf
• https://cnr.ncsu.edu/news/2021/12/explainer-how-wildfires-start-and-spread/
• https://dnrc.mt.gov/News/dnrc-news/Drought-Conditions-Improve-Following-Two-Years-of-Extreme-Drought-Much-of-Montana-Still-Abnormally-Dry-news-article
• https://dnrc.mt.gov/Forestry/Wildfire/fire-prevention-and-preparedness
• https://des.mt.gov/Grant-Programs/HMGP-Post-Fire
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29272827/
• https://www.epa.gov/air-research/wildland-fire-research-health-effects-research
• https://www.fs.usda.gov/features/be-fire-wise-preparing-your-home-wildfire-season
• https://nara.getarchive.net/media/fire-wildfire-chino-calif-november-20-2008